Meghan Left FRUSTRATED In Tears As Her Name VANISHES From Official Royal Website From King's Order

 Recent reports have emerged suggesting that Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, was distressed upon discovering that her name had been removed from the official Royal Family website, allegedly by order of King Charles III. However, a thorough examination of credible sources indicates that these claims are largely unfounded and stem from misinterpretations of routine updates to the royal website.​



Background on the Royal Family Website Updates


In March 2024, the Royal Family's official website underwent a series of updates to reflect the current roles and statuses of its members. As part of this process, individual biography pages for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle were consolidated into a joint page titled "The Duke and Duchess of Sussex." This page acknowledges their decision to step back as senior working members of the Royal Family in 2020 and provides a brief overview of their marriage and children. Additionally, it directs visitors to their official website for more current information about their activities.​


Misinterpretations and Speculations


The restructuring of the website led to various interpretations. Some observers speculated that the consolidation of profiles signified a deliberate attempt to diminish Meghan's presence within the royal framework. However, it's important to note that such updates are standard practice to ensure the website accurately reflects the evolving dynamics of the Royal Family. There is no substantial evidence to suggest that King Charles III personally ordered the removal of Meghan's name from the website.​


Meghan Markle's Use of the 'Sussex' Name


Amid these discussions, Meghan Markle has embraced the use of "Sussex" as her surname in various personal and professional endeavors. For instance, she launched a new fashion website using the URL "shopmy.us/ms," which appears to stand for "Meghan Sussex." On the site, her name is listed as "Meghan, Duchess of Sussex," indicating her continued association with the title. This move aligns with royal traditions where territorial designations are used as surnames, similar to how other royal family members have adopted titles like "Wales" or "Wessex" in the past.​

Previous Post Next Post